ABSTRACT
Objective To research the clinical effect of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate (PKEP) in the treatment of high-risk huge benign prostate hyperplasia(BPH).Methods Fifty-two cases of high-risk huge(＞120 g) BPH in this hospita1 from May 2010 to May 2015 were selected and performed PKEP.International prostate symptoms score(IPSS),quality of life(QOL) score,residual urine(RUV) and biggest urine flow rate(Qmax) were observed after operation.Results The mean operation time was (130.12 ± 12.14) min,the mean intraroperation bleeding amount was (120.24±9.81) mL,the mean hospital stay was (14.52 ± 1.82)d,the mean weight of resected prostate tissues was (113.42 ± 12.53)g.Follow-up lasted for 6 months without serious complications.IPSS、QOL,RUV and Qmax after operation were improved obviously,the difference was statistically significant compared with before operation(P＜0.05).Conclusion PKEP is safe and effective in the treatment of high-risk huge BPH.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare and analyze clinical effects of Bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) on the treatment huge benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods Nine-six cases of huge benign prostatic hyperplasia were selected in this hospital from March 2012 to March 2015.All the patients were divided into two groups according to different operation method,namely PKEP group and TURP group.Then the operative time,bleeding amount,bladder washing time,hospital stay,complications between two groups were compared,and the international prostate symptom score (IPSS),quality of life score (QOL),maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax),residual urine volume 6 months before and after operation were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time [(100.0 ± 3.5)min],bleeding amount [(161.0 ± 9.2) mL],bladder washing time[(15.2 ± 1.2) h],hospital stay[(10.8 ± 2.6) d],complications (6 cases) in PKEP group were less than that in the TURP group,which were(132.0±4.2)min,(198.0±12.1)mL,(36.8±1.3)h,(13.6±2.9)d,complications (18 cases)respectively(P＜0.05).The IPSS,QOL,Qmax,residual urine volume in both group were significantly improved compared with surgery before(P＜0.05),and there were no significant differences between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion PKEP and TURP both are effective surgeries for the treatment of huge BPH,while PKEP has short operation time,less intraoperarive bleeding and low incidence of complications,it is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the safety and efficiency of patients with impacted upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection treated by ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URL ) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) .Methods 126 cases of impacted upper ureteral calculi combined with renal intrarenal infection were treated in this hos-pita1 from July 2007 to July 2011 ,including 58 cases of URL ,68 cases of MPCNL .The success rate of primary lithotripsy ,stone-free rate ,postoperative adjuvant therapy ,operative time ,hospital stay ,incidence of postoperative complications and other data were analyzed .Results The success rate of group URL was 82 .76% (48/58) ,the success rate of group MPCNL was 100 .00% .The stone-free rate seven day after operation :URL was 62 .07% (36/58) ,MPCNL was 98 .53% (67/68)(P0 .05) .Conclusion It has higher successful rate and stone-free rate in patients with upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection by MPCNL than those treated by URL .The safety and efficency of the former is better that of the latter .MPCNL can be the first choice for the upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection .